Cardioid vs. Omnidirectional Microphones: Which One Should You Choose?

Brandon Mendoza
3 min readApr 11, 2023

--

Photo by Jonathan Farber on Unsplash

This post may contain affiliate links that at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Thank you for your support!

When it comes to microphones, two main polar patterns are commonly used: cardioid and omnidirectional. Each polar pattern has its own set of advantages and disadvantages depending on the intended use and environment. In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at the pros and cons of using a cardioid microphone and an omnidirectional microphone.

Cardioid Microphone

A cardioid microphone is a unidirectional microphone that picks up sound from the front of the microphone while rejecting sound from the sides and rear. The name “cardioid” comes from the heart-shaped pattern of sensitivity that the microphone exhibits. This polar pattern is ideal for recording vocals or other sound sources that are located directly in front of the microphone while minimizing ambient noise and background sounds.

Pros:

  • Cardioid microphones are highly directional, which makes them ideal for recording sound sources that are located directly in front of the microphone.
  • They offer excellent rejection of sounds from the sides and rear, which helps to minimize background noise and feedback.
  • They are ideal for live sound reinforcement as they can help isolate the sound source from the rest of the stage.

Cons:

  • Cardioid microphones are less effective at capturing ambient sounds and room acoustics compared to omnidirectional microphones.
  • If the sound source moves away from the front of the microphone, the volume and quality of the recording will be affected.
  • They require careful positioning to ensure optimal recording quality.

Omnidirectional Microphone

An omnidirectional microphone picks up sound from all directions, making it ideal for recording ambient sounds and capturing room acoustics. The microphone’s polar pattern is spherical, meaning it captures sound equally from all directions.

Pros:

  • Omnidirectional microphones are ideal for capturing ambient sounds and room acoustics.
  • They are more forgiving when it comes to microphone positioning, as they don’t require careful positioning to capture sound from the source.
  • They are ideal for recording large groups of people or instruments in a single room.

Cons:

  • They are less effective at isolating the sound source from ambient noise and background sounds.
  • They are more prone to feedback and handling noise than cardioid microphones.
  • They can pick up unwanted sounds from all directions, which may require additional editing in post-production.

In summary, the choice between a cardioid microphone and an omnidirectional microphone depends on the intended use and environment. Cardioid microphones are ideal for recording sound sources that are located directly in front of the microphone while minimizing ambient noise and background sounds. Omnidirectional microphones are ideal for capturing ambient sounds and room acoustics, making them ideal for recording large groups of people or instruments in a single room. Ultimately, the choice of microphone will depend on the specific recording situation and the desired outcome.

Here are some of the best-selling microphones in each category:

Cardioid Microphones:

  1. Shure SM7B — This microphone is a favorite among podcasters and musicians for its excellent sound quality and noise reduction.
  2. Audio-Technica AT4053B — This microphone is known for its transparent and natural sound quality, making it a popular choice for recording vocals and acoustic instruments.
  3. Rode NT1-A — This microphone is a budget-friendly-er option that offers a clear and crisp sound, making it popular among home studio owners.
  4. Samson Q2U — This is a very affordable microphone with USB digital output for connecting to a computer and XLR analog output for connecting to a mixer, audio interface, or portable PA systems.

Omnidirectional Microphones:

  1. Blue Yeti — This USB microphone is a popular choice among podcasters and streamers for its ease of use and excellent sound quality. Although now a lot of people have been more critical of it for being overpriced and maybe even overrated.
  2. Audio-Technica AT4022 — This microphone offers a wide frequency response and low self-noise, making it a popular choice for recording vocals and acoustic instruments.
  3. Zoom H2n — This handheld recorder offers four different polar patterns, including omnidirectional, making it a versatile option for recording in different environments.

It’s worth noting that there are many other great microphones available in each category, and the best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and budget.

--

--

No responses yet